Editorial: Holding the Line for Access to Running Water in Pulaski County

Published on 15 April 2026 at 08:21

Someone asked one of our editors the following question:

"What does it say about our priorities when officials can justify funding non-essential programs and using tax incentives for well-funded development projects while some residents still can't access running water?”

The person was referring to a few different things: 1) the more than a half a million dollars paid out to SPEDA by Pulaski County residents each year, 2) the TIF district that was put in place by local government to fund the infrastructure for the development in the southern end of the city a few years ago, and 3) there are people in our county that are still hauling water for their basic needs.  

Let's be clear here, this is not a pro or anti campaign issue. Access to clean water has been recognized internationally as a basic human right—yet some residents in our own community still struggle to access it. We also want to be clear that no one is being accused of violating rights or committing a crime. We are helping to shed light on what many in our community view as a priority matter.   

Right now, in our county, families are still living without direct access to a water line. On Herrin Lane in Shopville, one 69-year-old disabled veteran is hauling 1,000 gallons of water every week—multiple trips, nearly 20 miles each time—just to meet basic needs.

According to a recent Facebook post, pleading the issue this time around, stated there are 7 occupied properties on that stretch, including children, disabled residents, and other vulnerable individuals.

For those who regularly attend, or watch, the Pulaski County Fiscal Court Livestream meetings, you will likely know that this issue has been raised before—publicly, and directly to the members of Fiscal Court. We will have to double check, but we believe there were/are other cases in our county similar to Herrin Lane.

Now, as attention resurfaces, we are asking direct questions:

  • What specific actions have been taken since this was last raised a few years ago?

  • What grant opportunities have been pursued, and what is their status?

  •  What agencies or partners are currently engaged?

  • What is the actual timeline for extending water service to this area?

  • How many other areas in the county are facing similar conditions?

Photo by Steffen Ruhlmann | Pexels

We are also asking a broader question:

Why are residents in 2026 still expected to bear tens of thousands of dollars in costs for basic water access without structured, transparent pathways for assistance?

If there has been meaningful progress, we will report it. If any resident in Pulaski County has been assisted with this issue, we would like to know so we can highlight how others can receive assistance. If there has not, we will continue to ask why.

We have read various replies to the social media posts and there appeared to be potential avenues for resolution, including grant funding and coordination with the Southeastern Water Association (or other districts). We hope these are real and actionable options.

Somerset Pulaski Advocate will be following this issue closely—not just now, but beyond the election cycle—until there is clear, documented resolution or a transparent explanation of barriers. 

This is not about politics. It is about accountability, infrastructure, and ensuring that no one in this county is left without access to something as fundamental as water. 

SPA was tagged in the original post and would love to speak with the residents who are currently without access to help keep the light on the issue. Please email us at info@somerset-pulaski-advocate.org 

If you are not a resident directly impacted, but have information, documentation, or insight related to this issue or similar situations in the county, we encourage you to reach out and share the information as well.

Public awareness drives action—and we intend to keep that awareness going.